Skip to main content

Covid-19: What lessons?

To date, COVID-19 has infected 1.2 million people and killed 67,000. There are many questions and angles to explore: nature of the virus, causes of spread, degree of severity, status and evolution of the pandemic, possible treatments and vaccines, etc. Today I will focus on some lessons that can be learned from the evolving crisis and specifically some timely and effective decisions that have been taken so far.
More than three months after the start of COVID-19, some countries have clearly achieved impressive results.

Taiwan, which has one of the world’s most advanced and accessible health care systems, began by banning access to foreigners and then applied a combination of vigilance, proactive measures and information sharing with the public. The production of masks was quickly ramped up to 10 million per day. A unified command centre was set up, headed by the Minister of Health and Welfare. Taiwan used big data analysis technology. All of the above was accomplished with a great deal of transparency. Result: 363 cases and 5 deaths for a population of 22 million.

South Korea opted for a mass testing policy (19,000 free tests per day), 600 test centres, including 50 drive-through kiosks (a world’s first), cell phone alerts. Result: relatively small numbers, with 10,000 cases and 183 deaths for a population of 51 million.a

China, the first country affected by the epidemic, quickly established containment in three cities affecting a total of 60 million inhabitants. Actions included closure of schools, construction of two hospitals in 10 days and a dozen temporary hospitals, temperature monitoring, tracing of suspected cases, door-to-door controls, quarantine of infected people. Through a well-designed and strict approach, confinement was enforced under the best possible conditions by ensuring people had access to everything they needed, including the delivery of meals to the inhabitants of these cities. Result: stabilization of the infection with 82,000 cases and 3,300 deaths for a population of 1.5 billion.

Singapore, which has a high-quality health system, has used a policy of enforced quarantine, with contact tracing, heavy penalties for offenders (up to $10,000, 6 months prison), generous financial assistance ($100/day for self-employed workers). Result: 1300 cases and 6 deaths for a population of 5.6 million.

Measures taken in Hong Kong included restrictions on border traffic, closure of schools and playgrounds, free distribution of hand sanitizer, temperature monitoring, public information on the age of infected people and the location of quarantined and self-isolated people. Result: 890 cases and 4 deaths for a population of 7.5 million.
Final, a measure common to all of these countries: the wearing of masks is strongly recommended.

These examples show there is not ONE right strategy. Everything depends on the seriousness of decision-makers and the means they deploy to enforce well-conceived and timely measures. These examples also illustrate the irreplaceable role of governments. In my opinion, they are the best placed and the best equipped to deal with a crisis like this.

These are industrialized countries. I will discuss other experiences later.

Benyounès

Comments

  1. Adeem Hassan KhanApril 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM

    I hope things get better everywhere. All other governments should adopt and combine these strategies that your mentioned because they are not just good but proven too as shown by their respective numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Benyounès SaidiApril 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM

      I can't agree more, Adeem! Let's hope these lessons are heard, because lives are at stake.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi
Post a Comment
Read more

France: results and challenges

The New Popular Front won 182 seats in the snap parliamentary elections, making it the largest group in the French National Assembly, which has 577 seats. This is obviously a reason for immense satisfaction and relief for millions of French people who were enduring the anti-social policies of Macron's regime. It is also an open opportunity for all those who want real change. That said, and without minimizing the results obtained, it must be remembered that the new Popular Front only secured 31.2% of the seats in the National Assembly and that the percentage of French people who voted for it represents only 25.1% of the votes. In comparison, the Popular Front of 1936 obtained 63.5% of the seats and 57.8% of the French voted for it! This means that the New Popular Front is far behind the 1936 performance. But all this does not take away from the immense success achieved this week. It simply means that the New Front has enormous task to perform to convince more French people of the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Hamas cannot be destroyed" because "it is an idea." !!

No, this is not a statement from Hamas, but from Daniel Hagari, the spokesperson for the Zionist army! It took 37,000 deaths and the destruction of an entire territory for the Zionist army to recognize this!  Why did it take 37,000 deaths to acknowledge this? Because Israel is an occupying army, and colonial occupying armies do not understand that a colonized people can resist.  Why also this "idea"? For a simple reason: Palestine was colonized and its people had only one choice, which was to resist the occupier.  Similarly, the Zionist entity reveals itself for what it is: Europeans who came to colonize a territory, as has been done for centuries. The European settlers who created the Zionist movement are Ashkenazi Jews who have no connection to Palestine. They are Russians, Poles, Belarusians, Austrians, Romanians, etc. The Zionist movement is a racist movement, just like Nazism: it presumes a "pure race."  The Jewish religion was born in Palestine, and people con...
Post a Comment
Read more