Skip to main content

Earthquake in Morocco and other upheavals

Following the terrible earthquake that struck Morocco, the Moroccan authorities accepted help from 4 friendly countries to cope with the immediate response. What followed was a controversy created and fueled by the French media which consisted of calling into question the decisions of the national authorities. The French Minister of Foreign Affairs put things straight by recalling that the Moroccan authorities are acting with complete sovereignty in the management of this terrible tragedy.


Apparently this was not enough since it was the President of the French Republic himself who insisted on making a speech intended to silence this controversy. But in doing so, he made an absolutely incredible mistake: he spoke directly to Moroccan citizens!


Since when does the head of state of a country speak directly to the citizens of another sovereign country? There is only one explanation: colonial behaviour is still present among French officials and the controversy created by the French media is only an illustration. It is useful to remember that several countries - including the United States, Germany, Canada, Turkey, Algeria, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, Czechia - offered their help, but none of them took offense at the decisions of the Moroccan authorities. It is high time for French officials to abandon this colonial behaviour. I hope that the Moroccan authorities will face this unacceptable attitude, either by not responding to this speech, or by instructing, for example, the Director of European Affairs, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to do so.


That being said, this controversy reveals two things. First, Morocco has reached the stage which allows it in a period of natural disaster to manage the situation with complete sovereignty and in doing so, to accept aid which falls within the framework of its strategy. It is worth remembering that other countries have reached this stage before, including Brazil, China, Iran, Pakistan and India.


Secondly, Western countries are "baffled" by this new episode (1) as they were  when India decided to reject foreign aid in 2004. And now Morocco is doing the same thing! It is worth remembering that the Western media have shown, to varying degrees, the same "incomprehension" with regard to the decisions of the Moroccan authorities. But the most virulent reaction was that of France, which did not understand how the "natives" dared reject their aid. This is what is called a colonial attitude.


One thing is certain: people are recovering their sovereignty which was taken away from them for too long . And countries that do not understand this incur the risk of being left out of History.


Benyounes Saidi


"Morocco’s reluctance to accept quake aid baffles foreign governments" I Washington Post, September 11th 2023


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

France: results and challenges

The New Popular Front won 182 seats in the snap parliamentary elections, making it the largest group in the French National Assembly, which has 577 seats. This is obviously a reason for immense satisfaction and relief for millions of French people who were enduring the anti-social policies of Macron's regime. It is also an open opportunity for all those who want real change. That said, and without minimizing the results obtained, it must be remembered that the new Popular Front only secured 31.2% of the seats in the National Assembly and that the percentage of French people who voted for it represents only 25.1% of the votes. In comparison, the Popular Front of 1936 obtained 63.5% of the seats and 57.8% of the French voted for it! This means that the New Popular Front is far behind the 1936 performance. But all this does not take away from the immense success achieved this week. It simply means that the New Front has enormous task to perform to convince more French people of the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi
Post a Comment
Read more

"Hamas cannot be destroyed" because "it is an idea." !!

No, this is not a statement from Hamas, but from Daniel Hagari, the spokesperson for the Zionist army! It took 37,000 deaths and the destruction of an entire territory for the Zionist army to recognize this!  Why did it take 37,000 deaths to acknowledge this? Because Israel is an occupying army, and colonial occupying armies do not understand that a colonized people can resist.  Why also this "idea"? For a simple reason: Palestine was colonized and its people had only one choice, which was to resist the occupier.  Similarly, the Zionist entity reveals itself for what it is: Europeans who came to colonize a territory, as has been done for centuries. The European settlers who created the Zionist movement are Ashkenazi Jews who have no connection to Palestine. They are Russians, Poles, Belarusians, Austrians, Romanians, etc. The Zionist movement is a racist movement, just like Nazism: it presumes a "pure race."  The Jewish religion was born in Palestine, and people con...
Post a Comment
Read more