Skip to main content

Earthquake in Morocco and other upheavals

Following the terrible earthquake that struck Morocco, the Moroccan authorities accepted help from 4 friendly countries to cope with the immediate response. What followed was a controversy created and fueled by the French media which consisted of calling into question the decisions of the national authorities. The French Minister of Foreign Affairs put things straight by recalling that the Moroccan authorities are acting with complete sovereignty in the management of this terrible tragedy.


Apparently this was not enough since it was the President of the French Republic himself who insisted on making a speech intended to silence this controversy. But in doing so, he made an absolutely incredible mistake: he spoke directly to Moroccan citizens!


Since when does the head of state of a country speak directly to the citizens of another sovereign country? There is only one explanation: colonial behaviour is still present among French officials and the controversy created by the French media is only an illustration. It is useful to remember that several countries - including the United States, Germany, Canada, Turkey, Algeria, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, Czechia - offered their help, but none of them took offense at the decisions of the Moroccan authorities. It is high time for French officials to abandon this colonial behaviour. I hope that the Moroccan authorities will face this unacceptable attitude, either by not responding to this speech, or by instructing, for example, the Director of European Affairs, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to do so.


That being said, this controversy reveals two things. First, Morocco has reached the stage which allows it in a period of natural disaster to manage the situation with complete sovereignty and in doing so, to accept aid which falls within the framework of its strategy. It is worth remembering that other countries have reached this stage before, including Brazil, China, Iran, Pakistan and India.


Secondly, Western countries are "baffled" by this new episode (1) as they were  when India decided to reject foreign aid in 2004. And now Morocco is doing the same thing! It is worth remembering that the Western media have shown, to varying degrees, the same "incomprehension" with regard to the decisions of the Moroccan authorities. But the most virulent reaction was that of France, which did not understand how the "natives" dared reject their aid. This is what is called a colonial attitude.


One thing is certain: people are recovering their sovereignty which was taken away from them for too long . And countries that do not understand this incur the risk of being left out of History.


Benyounes Saidi


"Morocco’s reluctance to accept quake aid baffles foreign governments" I Washington Post, September 11th 2023


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Covid-19 Incredible news!

"Europe and the United States have decided to earmark 4% of all funds expended in the fight against Covid-19 to the eradication of malaria, AIDS and tuberculosis, diseases that kill millions of people every year." I was sitting in front of my TV watching the news. I could barely believe my ears. As the report continued, I turned up the sound so as not to miss a word. The United States has lifted sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela and sent 10 planes with medical equipment and personnel to assist those countries in their fight against Covid-19. The leaders of North and South Korea have signed an historic agreement to reunite their country, henceforth known as the Republic of Korea. The African and European Unions have signed a free trade agreement, under which goods and citizens may circulate freely from one continent to the other. The stock exchanges are now publishing daily figures on the profits of major companies, broken down by country, to serve as t...

Negotiations: Beyond Words

  After the first day of negotiations, Iran stated that some areas of convergence had been reached, but significant disagreements remain. Tehran called for continuing the diplomatic path despite the absence of an agreement. U.S. officials indicated that the discussions ended without a deal. According to them, Iran refused the American conditions, particularly regarding the nuclear issue. Nevertheless, the United States described the exchanges as serious while reaffirming its “red lines”. In a regional context marked by Israel’s opposition to Iran’s nuclear program, tensions between the United States and Iran continue to revolve around this issue. Since the creation of the Islamic Republic and the hostage crisis of 1979, several cycles of negotiations have taken place. At each stage, the level of U.S. representation has increased, moving from diplomats to government officials, then to special envoys, and today reaching the vice president. The U.S. president himself was reportedly in...

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi