Skip to main content

COVID-19: Erring to Red Herring

What is currently happening in France is worrisome to say the least.  The only possible comparison that comes to mind is that of 1930s Germany, where an ambitious young populist decreed that Germans of Jewish faith were the enemies of the nation.  We know the terrible aftermath resulting in millions of deaths and unspeakable horrors.


Why then this recent speech by the French president and his decisions that followed?  Let's recall the facts: France is facing a serious pandemic. The French president's management of the crisis has been chaotic to put it mildly: delayed official response, flawed assessment of the danger, the mask scandal, contradictory decisions, etc.

The result: tens of thousands of deaths and a bad situation becoming critical with an exponential increase in infections and a lack of intensive care beds. What does the French president then do?  He declares war on "Muslim separatism" – he said "Islamist" but for him there is obviously no difference.  A few months earlier he had declared war on the coronavirus. (This is clearly a president who is fond of war). And then, quite extraordinarily, just days after this speech, a teacher who had showed highschool students blasphemous caricatures of Islam's prophet is murdered.

This now has become the pretext for this president and his government to take measures ranging from the arrest of citizens who have expressed dissatisfaction with that teacher, to the closure of private schools and mosques to the banning of civil society organizations, basically creating a climate of terror.

This rhetoric about the dangers of "Islamic separatism" and "Islamist extremism" is clearly being used for one purpose: to create a diversion in the face of popular discontent with a government that has completely failed in its management of the pandemic, resulting in 36,000 deaths (a death rate among the highest in the world) and an uncontrollable rise in coronavirus cases. 

The mistakes and miscalculations of this president, including the stigmatization of millions of French citizens based on their faith, are dangerous and are conducive to a climate of violence, insurrection and no end of excesses.

I would hope that the voices of all those who cherish freedom, peace and justice will rise to condemn such incompetence.

Benyounès Saidi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Covid-19 Incredible news!

"Europe and the United States have decided to earmark 4% of all funds expended in the fight against Covid-19 to the eradication of malaria, AIDS and tuberculosis, diseases that kill millions of people every year." I was sitting in front of my TV watching the news. I could barely believe my ears. As the report continued, I turned up the sound so as not to miss a word. The United States has lifted sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela and sent 10 planes with medical equipment and personnel to assist those countries in their fight against Covid-19. The leaders of North and South Korea have signed an historic agreement to reunite their country, henceforth known as the Republic of Korea. The African and European Unions have signed a free trade agreement, under which goods and citizens may circulate freely from one continent to the other. The stock exchanges are now publishing daily figures on the profits of major companies, broken down by country, to serve as t...

Negotiations: Beyond Words

  After the first day of negotiations, Iran stated that some areas of convergence had been reached, but significant disagreements remain. Tehran called for continuing the diplomatic path despite the absence of an agreement. U.S. officials indicated that the discussions ended without a deal. According to them, Iran refused the American conditions, particularly regarding the nuclear issue. Nevertheless, the United States described the exchanges as serious while reaffirming its “red lines”. In a regional context marked by Israel’s opposition to Iran’s nuclear program, tensions between the United States and Iran continue to revolve around this issue. Since the creation of the Islamic Republic and the hostage crisis of 1979, several cycles of negotiations have taken place. At each stage, the level of U.S. representation has increased, moving from diplomats to government officials, then to special envoys, and today reaching the vice president. The U.S. president himself was reportedly in...

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi