Skip to main content

COVID-19: Erring to Red Herring

What is currently happening in France is worrisome to say the least.  The only possible comparison that comes to mind is that of 1930s Germany, where an ambitious young populist decreed that Germans of Jewish faith were the enemies of the nation.  We know the terrible aftermath resulting in millions of deaths and unspeakable horrors.


Why then this recent speech by the French president and his decisions that followed?  Let's recall the facts: France is facing a serious pandemic. The French president's management of the crisis has been chaotic to put it mildly: delayed official response, flawed assessment of the danger, the mask scandal, contradictory decisions, etc.

The result: tens of thousands of deaths and a bad situation becoming critical with an exponential increase in infections and a lack of intensive care beds. What does the French president then do?  He declares war on "Muslim separatism" – he said "Islamist" but for him there is obviously no difference.  A few months earlier he had declared war on the coronavirus. (This is clearly a president who is fond of war). And then, quite extraordinarily, just days after this speech, a teacher who had showed highschool students blasphemous caricatures of Islam's prophet is murdered.

This now has become the pretext for this president and his government to take measures ranging from the arrest of citizens who have expressed dissatisfaction with that teacher, to the closure of private schools and mosques to the banning of civil society organizations, basically creating a climate of terror.

This rhetoric about the dangers of "Islamic separatism" and "Islamist extremism" is clearly being used for one purpose: to create a diversion in the face of popular discontent with a government that has completely failed in its management of the pandemic, resulting in 36,000 deaths (a death rate among the highest in the world) and an uncontrollable rise in coronavirus cases. 

The mistakes and miscalculations of this president, including the stigmatization of millions of French citizens based on their faith, are dangerous and are conducive to a climate of violence, insurrection and no end of excesses.

I would hope that the voices of all those who cherish freedom, peace and justice will rise to condemn such incompetence.

Benyounès Saidi

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

France: results and challenges

The New Popular Front won 182 seats in the snap parliamentary elections, making it the largest group in the French National Assembly, which has 577 seats. This is obviously a reason for immense satisfaction and relief for millions of French people who were enduring the anti-social policies of Macron's regime. It is also an open opportunity for all those who want real change. That said, and without minimizing the results obtained, it must be remembered that the new Popular Front only secured 31.2% of the seats in the National Assembly and that the percentage of French people who voted for it represents only 25.1% of the votes. In comparison, the Popular Front of 1936 obtained 63.5% of the seats and 57.8% of the French voted for it! This means that the New Popular Front is far behind the 1936 performance. But all this does not take away from the immense success achieved this week. It simply means that the New Front has enormous task to perform to convince more French people of the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi
Post a Comment
Read more

"Hamas cannot be destroyed" because "it is an idea." !!

No, this is not a statement from Hamas, but from Daniel Hagari, the spokesperson for the Zionist army! It took 37,000 deaths and the destruction of an entire territory for the Zionist army to recognize this!  Why did it take 37,000 deaths to acknowledge this? Because Israel is an occupying army, and colonial occupying armies do not understand that a colonized people can resist.  Why also this "idea"? For a simple reason: Palestine was colonized and its people had only one choice, which was to resist the occupier.  Similarly, the Zionist entity reveals itself for what it is: Europeans who came to colonize a territory, as has been done for centuries. The European settlers who created the Zionist movement are Ashkenazi Jews who have no connection to Palestine. They are Russians, Poles, Belarusians, Austrians, Romanians, etc. The Zionist movement is a racist movement, just like Nazism: it presumes a "pure race."  The Jewish religion was born in Palestine, and people con...
Post a Comment
Read more