Skip to main content

Covid-19: What has it changed?

The different ways governments have responded to the coronavirus pandemic is quite incredible. Granted, it is a novel virus, but it is not the first. And this is the 21st century, which is to say that humanity has made enormous strides in terms of scientific and technological knowledge. Common sense alone dictates that we behave rationally to deal with the situation, by gathering all available information, adopting evidence-based strategies and policies, and assuring coordination among all countries. While we have witnessed solidarity initiatives in Asia, Europe and Africa, this is not the norm and in any case there is no real international collaboration.


In the United States, the response has been an absolute free-for-all, with a president who does not believe in the pandemic and asks people to drink bleach, governors who decide one thing today and something else tomorrow, city mayors who decide something else altogether, politicians who blame each other, and the list goes on.

Elsewhere, it has not been much better: in France, we saw the soap opera over masks, and in other countries this incredible dance of confinement-deconfinement-reconfinement based on changing statistics, interpretation of the science and prevailing interests.

And then there are the non-industrialized nations, which have been doing their best with their limited means. 
In terms of treatments and vaccines, the predominant approach seems to be each man for himself.

Lamentably, the only takeaway from this pandemic so far is that countries have not learned any lessons and the status quo prevails. We have to accept that conditions are not yet in place for any real change.

Benyounès

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi
Post a Comment
Read more

France: results and challenges

The New Popular Front won 182 seats in the snap parliamentary elections, making it the largest group in the French National Assembly, which has 577 seats. This is obviously a reason for immense satisfaction and relief for millions of French people who were enduring the anti-social policies of Macron's regime. It is also an open opportunity for all those who want real change. That said, and without minimizing the results obtained, it must be remembered that the new Popular Front only secured 31.2% of the seats in the National Assembly and that the percentage of French people who voted for it represents only 25.1% of the votes. In comparison, the Popular Front of 1936 obtained 63.5% of the seats and 57.8% of the French voted for it! This means that the New Popular Front is far behind the 1936 performance. But all this does not take away from the immense success achieved this week. It simply means that the New Front has enormous task to perform to convince more French people of the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Hamas cannot be destroyed" because "it is an idea." !!

No, this is not a statement from Hamas, but from Daniel Hagari, the spokesperson for the Zionist army! It took 37,000 deaths and the destruction of an entire territory for the Zionist army to recognize this!  Why did it take 37,000 deaths to acknowledge this? Because Israel is an occupying army, and colonial occupying armies do not understand that a colonized people can resist.  Why also this "idea"? For a simple reason: Palestine was colonized and its people had only one choice, which was to resist the occupier.  Similarly, the Zionist entity reveals itself for what it is: Europeans who came to colonize a territory, as has been done for centuries. The European settlers who created the Zionist movement are Ashkenazi Jews who have no connection to Palestine. They are Russians, Poles, Belarusians, Austrians, Romanians, etc. The Zionist movement is a racist movement, just like Nazism: it presumes a "pure race."  The Jewish religion was born in Palestine, and people con...
Post a Comment
Read more