Skip to main content

Covid-19: What has it changed?

The different ways governments have responded to the coronavirus pandemic is quite incredible. Granted, it is a novel virus, but it is not the first. And this is the 21st century, which is to say that humanity has made enormous strides in terms of scientific and technological knowledge. Common sense alone dictates that we behave rationally to deal with the situation, by gathering all available information, adopting evidence-based strategies and policies, and assuring coordination among all countries. While we have witnessed solidarity initiatives in Asia, Europe and Africa, this is not the norm and in any case there is no real international collaboration.


In the United States, the response has been an absolute free-for-all, with a president who does not believe in the pandemic and asks people to drink bleach, governors who decide one thing today and something else tomorrow, city mayors who decide something else altogether, politicians who blame each other, and the list goes on.

Elsewhere, it has not been much better: in France, we saw the soap opera over masks, and in other countries this incredible dance of confinement-deconfinement-reconfinement based on changing statistics, interpretation of the science and prevailing interests.

And then there are the non-industrialized nations, which have been doing their best with their limited means. 
In terms of treatments and vaccines, the predominant approach seems to be each man for himself.

Lamentably, the only takeaway from this pandemic so far is that countries have not learned any lessons and the status quo prevails. We have to accept that conditions are not yet in place for any real change.

Benyounès

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Covid-19 Incredible news!

"Europe and the United States have decided to earmark 4% of all funds expended in the fight against Covid-19 to the eradication of malaria, AIDS and tuberculosis, diseases that kill millions of people every year." I was sitting in front of my TV watching the news. I could barely believe my ears. As the report continued, I turned up the sound so as not to miss a word. The United States has lifted sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela and sent 10 planes with medical equipment and personnel to assist those countries in their fight against Covid-19. The leaders of North and South Korea have signed an historic agreement to reunite their country, henceforth known as the Republic of Korea. The African and European Unions have signed a free trade agreement, under which goods and citizens may circulate freely from one continent to the other. The stock exchanges are now publishing daily figures on the profits of major companies, broken down by country, to serve as t...

Negotiations: Beyond Words

  After the first day of negotiations, Iran stated that some areas of convergence had been reached, but significant disagreements remain. Tehran called for continuing the diplomatic path despite the absence of an agreement. U.S. officials indicated that the discussions ended without a deal. According to them, Iran refused the American conditions, particularly regarding the nuclear issue. Nevertheless, the United States described the exchanges as serious while reaffirming its “red lines”. In a regional context marked by Israel’s opposition to Iran’s nuclear program, tensions between the United States and Iran continue to revolve around this issue. Since the creation of the Islamic Republic and the hostage crisis of 1979, several cycles of negotiations have taken place. At each stage, the level of U.S. representation has increased, moving from diplomats to government officials, then to special envoys, and today reaching the vice president. The U.S. president himself was reportedly in...

Justice on the Side of the Palestinian People

July 19, 2024, marks a monumental victory for justice, which has clearly sided with the rights of the Palestinian people. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an opinion declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. The court demanded that all states take action to end this occupation and that Israel pay reparations to Palestinians who have suffered due to this situation. It is important to note that this opinion follows a recent decision by the Court requiring Israel to cease any actions in Gaza that could constitute genocide. This ICJ opinion will strengthen international pressure on Israel. Although it will take time, just like the end of apartheid in South Africa, there is no doubt that justice will prevail and that Palestinians will regain their right to self-determination. Benyounès Saidi