Over the past 48 hours, the U.S. president issued a two-day ultimatum to Iran regarding the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, only to ultimately back down. This decision followed Tehran’s firm response, reaffirming its refusal to yield to any external pressure. Washington announced negotiations expected to last five days, suggesting a possible dialogue, but Iran denied any discussions, direct or indirect, indicating that the American statement was largely intended to “save face.” It should be recalled that this confrontation, involving Israel and the United States, targets a sovereign state. The Israeli government, particularly its Prime Minister, played a major role in drawing Washington into the confrontation, which goes beyond U.S. interests and is part of a complex regional dynamic where Iran’s sovereignty faces multiple strategic pressures. Iran responded with determination, defending its territory and sovereignty. It is clear that this aggression primarily serves Israeli objective...
Significant divisions exist today between U.S. President Trump and several European leaders. Tensions arose when he expressed his intention to annex Greenland, an autonomous territory under Denmark. The Israeli-American aggression against Iran has deepened these divisions. Washington sought the support of European countries, but many refused. During an exchange with Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin, Trump even raised the possibility of the United States withdrawing from NATO. Founded in 1949 to face the Soviet Union, NATO should have disappeared with the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact (a military alliance of Soviet bloc countries). Instead of that, it expanded, growing from 12 members at its creation to 32 today. A U.S. withdrawal would mark the end of NATO and allow a return to a more normal situation, opening the way to a new European space based on economic cooperation and cultural exchange, “from the Urals to the Atlantic.” Paradoxically, the agg...